Add an audio file
En mi material
- Info
- Noticias
- Multimedia
- Banco de Prueba
- Tutos&Consejos
- Opinión
Shure 565SD : la opinión de stompboxjon
" Chrome?"
()
Características
El Shure 565 SD es una se puede comprar por alrededor de 140 dólares. es un micrófono muy bueno para su voz, sobre todo las voces principales alcance. es un micrófono muy versátil y es similar a algunos modelos que otros Shure hace. ¿Qué es lo que no entiendo, después de comparar esto con el Shure SM58 Yo realmente no puedo decir una diferencia entre los dos micrófonos. Así que ésta es la plata y el negro SM58 s. Todo lo demás parecía ser exactamente lo mismo al mismo tiempo, poner a prueba y el uso de ellos. Dicen que este micrófono tiene una mejor construido en el filtro pop de su voz, pero cuando se utiliza el al igual que los modelos de shure otras similares a ésta.
Ver / editar la fuente inglesa
The Shure 565 SD is a can be purchased for around 140 dollars. it’s a very good mic for your vocals, especially the ranging lead vocals. it’s a very versatile mic and is similar to a few other models that shure makes. Which is what I don’t understand, after comparing this to the Shure SM58 I really cant tell a difference between the two mics. Just that this one is silver and the SM58 s black. Everything else seemed to be exactly the same while testing them out and using them. They say that this mic has a better built in pop filter for your vocals but when using it its just like the other shure models similar to this one.
Opinión Global
La respuesta de frecuencia es de 50 a 15.000 Hz, que es bastante estándar. Y como se dijo antes de que sea un micrófono cromado. ¿Qué se ve muy bonito, pero yo no quiero un micrófono bonita, si cuesta más que a mis otros micrófonos y no suena diferente. Usted sólo debe pagar por la placa de cromo con la SD Shure SM58 564 porque mis sonidos justicia de la misma. Todo en este micrófono y con los micrófonos otros parecen tan parecidos a como el registro, se siente, el peso. Es casi como si acabaran sumergido en cromo y que cambió el nombre.
En general, es un buen micro sin duda alguna. Pero ir con el Shure SM 58 y ahorrar algo de dinero! Son exactamente lo mismo para mí y el costo SM58 mucho menos. Además, el plateado de cromo no es tan atractivo para mí de todos modos. Prefiero tener chapado en oro en todo caso. Pero no es menos cierto que es un buen micro, si realmente quieren pagar 140 por un micrófono que usted puede conseguir mucho más barato en negro, ¿verdad? No entiendo lo que shure estaba tratando de hacer.
En general, es un buen micro sin duda alguna. Pero ir con el Shure SM 58 y ahorrar algo de dinero! Son exactamente lo mismo para mí y el costo SM58 mucho menos. Además, el plateado de cromo no es tan atractivo para mí de todos modos. Prefiero tener chapado en oro en todo caso. Pero no es menos cierto que es un buen micro, si realmente quieren pagar 140 por un micrófono que usted puede conseguir mucho más barato en negro, ¿verdad? No entiendo lo que shure estaba tratando de hacer.
Ver / editar la fuente inglesa
The Frequency response is 50 to 15,000 hz which is pretty standard. And as stated before it’s a chrome plated mic. Which looks really nice but I don’t want a nice looking mic if it cost more than my other mics and doesn’t sound any different. You must just be paying for the chrome plate with the Shure 564 SD because my SM58 sounds jus the same. Everything with this mic and with the other mics seem so much alike from how the record , feel, weight. Its almost like they just dipped in it chrome and changed the name.
Overall, it’s a good mic no doubt about it. But go with the Shure SM 58 and save some money! They are exactly the same to me and the SM58 cost a lot less. Plus the silver chrome plating isn’t that appealing to me anyways. I would rather have gold plated if anything. But none the less it’s a good mic, if you really want to pay 140 for a mic that you can get a lot cheaper in black, would you? I don’t understand what shure was trying to do.
Overall, it’s a good mic no doubt about it. But go with the Shure SM 58 and save some money! They are exactly the same to me and the SM58 cost a lot less. Plus the silver chrome plating isn’t that appealing to me anyways. I would rather have gold plated if anything. But none the less it’s a good mic, if you really want to pay 140 for a mic that you can get a lot cheaper in black, would you? I don’t understand what shure was trying to do.
Original English text: chrome?Characteristics
The Shure 565 SD is a can be purchased for around 140 dollars. it’s a very good mic for your vocals, especially the ranging lead vocals. it’s a very versatile mic and is similar to a few other models that shure makes. Which is what I don’t understand, after comparing this to the Shure SM58 I really cant tell a difference between the two mics. Just that this one is silver and the SM58 s black. Everything else seemed to be exactly the same while testing them out and using them. They say that this mic has a better built in pop filter for your vocals but when using it its just like the other shure models similar to this one.
Overall Opinion
The Frequency response is 50 to 15,000 hz which is pretty standard. And as stated before it’s a chrome plated mic. Which looks really nice but I don’t want a nice looking mic if it cost more than my other mics and doesn’t sound any different. You must just be paying for the chrome plate with the Shure 564 SD because my SM58 sounds jus the same. Everything with this mic and with the other mics seem so much alike from how the record , feel, weight. Its almost like they just dipped in it chrome and changed the name.
Overall, it’s a good mic no doubt about it. But go with the Shure SM 58 and save some money! They are exactly the same to me and the SM58 cost a lot less. Plus the silver chrome plating isn’t that appealing to me anyways. I would rather have gold plated if anything. But none the less it’s a good mic, if you really want to pay 140 for a mic that you can get a lot cheaper in black, would you? I don’t understand what shure was trying to do.
Overall, it’s a good mic no doubt about it. But go with the Shure SM 58 and save some money! They are exactly the same to me and the SM58 cost a lot less. Plus the silver chrome plating isn’t that appealing to me anyways. I would rather have gold plated if anything. But none the less it’s a good mic, if you really want to pay 140 for a mic that you can get a lot cheaper in black, would you? I don’t understand what shure was trying to do.
